<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The inevitable transition back into religiousness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetarpit.org/2015/the-transition-back-into-religiousness/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetarpit.org/2015/the-transition-back-into-religiousness</link>
	<description>"Now I feel like I know less about what that blog is about than I did before."</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 20:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://thetarpit.org</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: spyked</title>
		<link>http://thetarpit.org/2015/the-transition-back-into-religiousness#comment-3121</link>
		<dc:creator>spyked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 17:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.thetarpit.org/2015/the-transition-back-into-religiousness#comment-3121</guid>
		<description>This piece is such sheer simplistic bullshit.

&lt;blockquote&gt;People are not becoming less religious and more scientous, but they have become less religious in the past century, a century in which they have replaced religiousness-as-worship with something else.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, people have never become "less religious", especially &lt;em&gt;since&lt;/em&gt; they replaced religion with something else, that something else being simply: a belief in a different set of &lt;em&gt;ideals&lt;/em&gt;, more materialistic, yet more unattainable even than "nirvana" or "God" or what other metaphysicals have you. A set of "post-"religious beliefs, of course, "rationalistic", and so on and so forth, a belief in &lt;a href="http://thetarpit.org/2021/on-technology" rel="nofollow"&gt;technology&lt;/a&gt; and other entirely uninteresting carved images (and in any case, not even close to the Christian ones).

&lt;blockquote&gt;That can only mean that rough times, or rather "dark ages" are coming, and in these dark times people will be more and more susceptible to irrational arguments.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

"People", that is, bipedal monkeys, have &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; been susceptible to "irrational arguments". The whole fucking premise of the sexual revolution was "irrational", if by "irrational" you mean "rational from false premises". No, I won't give another example, look for it yourself.

&lt;blockquote&gt;in order to appeal to the irrational, but more rational than two thousand years ago mind&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh man, I won't even.

Yes, the so-called "dark ages" have come. But it will be yet some time of death, famine, pestilence and so on and so forth until these poor souls will be forgiven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This piece is such sheer simplistic bullshit.</p>
<blockquote><p>People are not becoming less religious and more scientous, but they have become less religious in the past century, a century in which they have replaced religiousness-as-worship with something else.</p></blockquote>
<p>No, people have never become "less religious", especially <em>since</em> they replaced religion with something else, that something else being simply: a belief in a different set of <em>ideals</em>, more materialistic, yet more unattainable even than "nirvana" or "God" or what other metaphysicals have you. A set of "post-"religious beliefs, of course, "rationalistic", and so on and so forth, a belief in <a href="http://thetarpit.org/2021/on-technology" rel="nofollow">technology</a> and other entirely uninteresting carved images (and in any case, not even close to the Christian ones).</p>
<blockquote><p>That can only mean that rough times, or rather "dark ages" are coming, and in these dark times people will be more and more susceptible to irrational arguments.</p></blockquote>
<p>"People", that is, bipedal monkeys, have <em>always</em> been susceptible to "irrational arguments". The whole fucking premise of the sexual revolution was "irrational", if by "irrational" you mean "rational from false premises". No, I won't give another example, look for it yourself.</p>
<blockquote><p>in order to appeal to the irrational, but more rational than two thousand years ago mind</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh man, I won't even.</p>
<p>Yes, the so-called "dark ages" have come. But it will be yet some time of death, famine, pestilence and so on and so forth until these poor souls will be forgiven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts on Charlie Hebdo, and the absolute necessity of offending people &#171; The Tar Pit</title>
		<link>http://thetarpit.org/2015/the-transition-back-into-religiousness#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on Charlie Hebdo, and the absolute necessity of offending people &#171; The Tar Pit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.thetarpit.org/2015/the-transition-back-into-religiousness#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] and moreover, nowadays' "offended" 30+ children, women and gays can't make up for the centuries of religiousness to come. There are times for you, me and all the other self-deprecating "victims" to suck it up, and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and moreover, nowadays' "offended" 30+ children, women and gays can't make up for the centuries of religiousness to come. There are times for you, me and all the other self-deprecating "victims" to suck it up, and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
