<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Further on the myth of "software engineering"</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetarpit.org/2016/the-myth-of-software-engineering-ii/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetarpit.org/2016/the-myth-of-software-engineering-ii</link>
	<description>"Now I feel like I know less about what that blog is about than I did before."</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 18:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://thetarpit.org</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: On the hellpits of abstraction &#171; The Tar Pit</title>
		<link>http://thetarpit.org/2016/the-myth-of-software-engineering-ii#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>On the hellpits of abstraction &#171; The Tar Pit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.thetarpit.org/2016/the-myth-of-software-engineering-ii#comment-308</guid>
		<description>[...] You've managed to completely ruin a bunch of otherwise respectable paradigms of thinking, and your software still sucks. So I guess we can now add "functional programming" to the list of things that, in retrospect, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You've managed to completely ruin a bunch of otherwise respectable paradigms of thinking, and your software still sucks. So I guess we can now add "functional programming" to the list of things that, in retrospect, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On system reliability, or, a top-down approach to (dispel the myth of) "software engineering" &#171; The Tar Pit</title>
		<link>http://thetarpit.org/2016/the-myth-of-software-engineering-ii#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>On system reliability, or, a top-down approach to (dispel the myth of) "software engineering" &#171; The Tar Pit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.thetarpit.org/2016/the-myth-of-software-engineering-ii#comment-41</guid>
		<description>[...] engineering" can only be considered an honest engineering discipline through the practice of making software suck less, the next logical step is figuring out how to do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] engineering" can only be considered an honest engineering discipline through the practice of making software suck less, the next logical step is figuring out how to do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
