<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TMSR work: plan for 2019 M9, and a very brief discussion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetarpit.org/2019/tmsr-work-v/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetarpit.org/2019/tmsr-work-v</link>
	<description>"Now I feel like I know less about what that blog is about than I did before."</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 05:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://thetarpit.org</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Common Lisp WWWism summary &#171; The Tar Pit</title>
		<link>http://thetarpit.org/2019/tmsr-work-v#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Lisp WWWism summary &#171; The Tar Pit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 06:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.thetarpit.org/2019/tmsr-work-v#comment-416</guid>
		<description>[...] Other than that, there is no "Hunchentoot versus Apache" contest to speak of, no matter how you choose to compare the two. So if I set out to write a Common Lisp web server from scratch, given my experience so far, I'm not sure I'd do a much better job than Hunchentoot (let alone Apache), at least not unless I spent a year or so (though I'm afraid this could easily turn into "a decade or so") reviewing WWW servers in more depth. And so, the question comes, is this really worth doing under the circumstances? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Other than that, there is no "Hunchentoot versus Apache" contest to speak of, no matter how you choose to compare the two. So if I set out to write a Common Lisp web server from scratch, given my experience so far, I'm not sure I'd do a much better job than Hunchentoot (let alone Apache), at least not unless I spent a year or so (though I'm afraid this could easily turn into "a decade or so") reviewing WWW servers in more depth. And so, the question comes, is this really worth doing under the circumstances? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Work plan for M10 2019 &#171; The Tar Pit</title>
		<link>http://thetarpit.org/2019/tmsr-work-v#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Work plan for M10 2019 &#171; The Tar Pit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.thetarpit.org/2019/tmsr-work-v#comment-128</guid>
		<description>[...] plan last month looked very good on paper, and yet reality went quite differently. Summarizing the CL-WWWism work, I've come to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] plan last month looked very good on paper, and yet reality went quite differently. Summarizing the CL-WWWism work, I've come to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
