Do you wonder, by the way, why "Tyranny and democracy" and not the other way around? Well, we've done this before and I for one ain't gonna repeat myself. Just bear in mind that I don't choose my titles on a whim.
In pondering the relationship between these two items, we must first and foremost keep in mind that each of them is in its own right an empty signifier; that is, both "absolute rule" and "rule of the people" are vague or otherwise general enough that discussion outside a well-delimited context is meaningless. At this point, the reader and I might as well go our separate ways and I could very damn well close the blog, for what is the journal other than a largely futile attempt to reach a common understanding... and yet let's make that effort, in the hope that it at least gets us somewhere rather than nowhere.
Anyways, in pondering the two items under scrutiny from a contextual perspective, some may be tempted towards anachronistic portrayals, while others may pull facile examples out of their hats. I am deliberately omitting the obvious case of DPRK, on which we will readily agree with respect to tyranny, but which will leave you shaking your head in disbelief when I mention democracy. Had you read the fucking lesson, then maybe you'd understand what I'm talking about; but as things currently stand, we're going to have to look for some more relatable context.
In looking further, I for one am willing to go as late as early 2021, since I still recall it quite clearly and since now is too recent a moment to be considered history; while at the same time I'll go no earlier than 2016, given that a whole boatload of things have changed since then and going further into the past will only bring more questions which by now may as well remain mysteries. So for our amusement, let us take the so-called "Russian collusion" for example. In doing this, let's leave aside the gargle in the press and attempt to use reason. The table contains precisely one set comprising two options: either Donald Trump colluded; or he didn't -- I hope you realize that there's no mid-way between the two, no "he put just the tip in", no "spectrum", no special interpretation which'd magically allow us to ignore the possibilities as they stand before us. Of course things are more complicated than that, but either way: collusion happened or it did not happen.
So then, if he did collude, then all the whining was legitimate: Trump broke the system by influencing the election on Twitter, or whatevers. He used the "Russian collusion machine" to gain absolute control over the minds of the sheeple, getting them to vote for him, which is a sort of democracy of brainwash signifying not merely a tyranny of the majority, but one of the majority as a mass incapable of thinking for itself, a perversion of all the ideals of "our" democracy.
If he on the other hand didn't collude, then... things sit precisely the same, only in reverse: Trump's political enemies used the very same tools to fool everyone and their dog into ensuring that the man is practically unable to get his second term. You may not agree with me -- and at this point in the argument I don't really care -- but getting people to believe a different lie through the very same mechanism actually denotes the precise same type of tyranny, except this time "our" democracy supposedly went the right an' proper way. In other words, I don't buy any argument which presupposes that the ends justify the means; they don't and that's that, now go home already.
What I'm trying to say is that in attempting to understand the relationship between tyranny and democracy, one comes to the inescapable conclusion that the two are not only compatible, they are inextricably tied. It's not even hard to see how they are tightly coupled in a historical root which started its life cycle during the French Revolution. But let's not get ahead of ourselves.
What I'm saying is that we Westerners have been living in a particularly grotesque version of North Korea for at least a decade now, only most of us were and still are too stupid to see it.
I suppose reality should start creeping in right about...
Right about now. Right? Right.
As the prophet Frank Zappa saidth:
"Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three..."
Ah wait, wrong scripture. I mean:
"The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater."
> Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three
Heheheh, nobody expects the Spanish inquisition!
Following recent developments in the Romanian space, I toyed with the idea of covering them in a separate article on the blog. But then I figured out that hey, whaddaya know, the whole shit in its magnificent entirety is right here. That is:
- it's all happened before and you're all watching a fucking cheap low-budget rerun, like they do it over here in the provinces
- the whole context and process is already described here in perfect detail, just replace Trump with Georgescu and Clinton with Lasconi and you have today's episode of the show
There's no way out of this either. What you naïvely imagined to be "democracy", assuming there ever was such a thing, is gone -- dead and buried, never to return, you understand me? If you're a Romanian in the year 2024, you've no actual choice but to submit to the same tyrannical regime, regardless of whether said tyranny is labeled "populist-authoritarian" or "pantsuit-socialist". You do realize that you've no more of a say in this than the walking dead, don't you?
P.S.: Do realize that the tyranny of the twenty-first century couldn't possibly be what you imagine by extrapolating from whatever account of history you've read or watched. Oh, how have the times changed, and how it's precisely so-called "civilized" life that's brought you to this point.
[...] it looks like I've decided to write an article about the recent developments in the Romanian space after all. Sure, I may be wrong -- and if I am, please, do feel free to correct me -- but that's the only [...]
[...] let's dub them the Saviours of Democracy, because that's exactly what they did: they saved democracy; and they saved it in a certain style, that is, by shooting it right between the eyes. In other [...]